SC stops award of P60-M compensation to Aussie | Global News

ҹ

SC stops award of P60-M compensation to Aussie

/ 08:25 AM September 16, 2012

ҹ FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme court has restrained the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) from executing a labor arbiter’s order that awarded P60 million in compensation to a foreigner who had no alien employment visa to work legally in the Philippines.

In an en banc resolution dated Sept. 4, 2012, the high court stopped the implementation of the Sept. 30, 2004 order issued by labor arbiter Salimathar Nambi in favor of Australian Andrew James McBurnie.

Article continues after this advertisement

2009 ruling

FEATURED STORIES

In an earlier decision dated Sept. 18, 2009, the court’s third division, then chaired by now retired Justice Consuelo Ynares Santiago, affirmed the labor arbiter’s order directing businessman Eulalio Ganzon, EGI Managers Inc. and E. Ganzon Inc. to pay P60 million to McBurnie.

A motion filed by Ganzon led to the third division referring the case to the court en banc.

Article continues after this advertisement

In absentia

Article continues after this advertisement

In his motion, Ganzon argued that on Nov. 17, 2009, the NLRC reversed the ruling of Nambi that granted P60 million in compensation to McBurnie but Nambi’s decision continued to hold sway.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a statement, Ganzon said while McBurnie purportedly personally filed his complaint at the NLRC in 2002, Bureau of Immigration records showed that the foreigner “had left the country for good three years before the complaint was filed.”

“At the time of the filing (of the complaint), McBurnie was abroad, thus the complaint was filed in absentia and another person pretending to be McBurnie was sworn in by the NLRC officer in Quezon City” to attest to the complaint, he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

McBurnie “failed to attend any of the 14 hearings intended for mediation.”

Not employee

Ganzon said the NLRC requires the presence of the complainant in hearings and that under its rules, “two missed hearings are equal to a dismissal” of the complaint.

“McBurnie was supposed to be an investor, not an employee. He never worked for me or in any of my companies. He requested to use EGI Managers Inc. to start a hotel business venture. As presented, I noted a condition of availability of funds before we could start our contract,” said Ganzon.

“McBurnie left the country in November 1999, a month and a half after the alleged start of contract in September 1999, while the complaint (at the NLRC) was filed in October 2002, when the labor claim would have prescribed,” he added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

Ganzon also said: “McBurnie has never been issued a working permit or an alien employment permit.”

MOST READ
newsinfo
www
entertainment
newsinfo
newsinfo
www
newsinfo
newsinfo
newsinfo
www
newsinfo
TAGS: employment visa, National Labor Relations Commission, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the and acknowledge that I have read the .

© Copyright 1997-2024 ҹ | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.