INCREASED US PRESENCE USS Topeka (SSN-754), a Los Angeles-class attack submarine, is docked at the Alava Pier of Subic port for a three-day port stop. The Supreme Court declaration that the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement between the United States and the Philippines will allow US forces to use Philippine military facilities, including the former US Subic Naval Base in Zambales province and Clark Air Base in Pampanga province. ALLAN MACATUNO/蜜桃工作室 NORTHERN LUZON
IN A RULING that allows the basing of more US military forces in the Philippines in the face of aggressive Chinese incursions in the South China Sea, the Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (Edca) between Manila and Washington.
In a 10-4 vote, the court removed the legal impediment that hung over the pact for nearly two years, junking two petitions questioning Edca鈥檚 constitutionality just as Philippine and US officials met in Washington to discuss China鈥檚 escalating military buildup in the region鈥檚 waters.
Coincidentally, just hours before Supreme Court spokesperson Theodore Te announced the ruling, a US attack submarine arrived at the former US naval base on Subic Bay.
Both the Philippines and the United States welcomed the court ruling.
鈥淭he Edca is a mutually beneficial agreement that will enhance our ability to provide rapid humanitarian assistance and help build capacity for the Armed Forces of the Philippines,鈥� the US Embassy said.
President Aquino鈥檚 spokesperson, Herminio Coloma Jr., said Edca would introduce the AFP to 鈥渢he most modern equipment and have a generational leap in our abilities.鈥�
China鈥檚 continuing incursions and land reclamation in the resource-rich waters of the South China Sea have been a lingering security concern in the Asia-Pacific region, becoming a backdrop for the signing of the Edca as an executive agreement in April 2014 to allow greater rotational presence of American troops in Philippine military bases.
鈥淎s it is, the Edca is not constitutionally infirm. As an executive agreement, it remains consistent with existing laws and treaties that it purports to implement. Wherefore, we hereby dismiss the petitions,鈥� the high court said in its ruling, a summary of which was released Tuesday.
The full decision has yet to be released. Those who dissented were Justices Teresita Leonardo-De Castro, Arturo Brion, Estela Perlas-Bernabe and Marvic Leonen. Associate Justice Francis Jardeleza had no part in the ruling, having handled the case during his time as Solicitor General.
One of the petitioners, Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan), said it would seek the court鈥檚 reconsideration of the case. The group decried the ruling as a 鈥渄e facto reversal of the 1991 Senate vote to boot out US bases from the Philippines.鈥� A separate plea was filed by former Senators Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Ta帽ada, who were among 12 senators who had voted against the US bases.
The court鈥檚 majority decision held that as the government had argued, the Edca was an implementing agreement of the 1999 Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT), ruling that the treaties already provided for the rotational presence of US troops here.
The court disagreed 鈥渢hat the Edca must be submitted to the Senate in the form of a treaty for concurrence by at least two-thirds of all the members of the Senate.鈥� The Senate position was submitted to the court during deliberations on the case.
The Edca falls under Article XVIII, Section 25, of the 1987 Constitution, the high tribunal said. This grants the President the power 鈥渢o enter into an executive agreement on foreign military bases, troops or facilities if 鈥渋t is not the instrument鈥� that allows such military basing, and 鈥渕erely aims to implement an existing law or treaty.鈥�
Through the 鈥減onencia鈥� by Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, the court held that 鈥渢he Edca is one such executive agreement,鈥� as it is not the principal pact through which US military presence was allowed, Te said in a press briefing.
鈥淭he court ruled that the Edca is not the instrument that allows US 鈥榯roops or facilities鈥� to enter as the VFA has already done that,鈥� said Te.
鈥淭he Edca provides arrangements to implement existing treaties allowing entry of foreign military troops or facilities under the VFA and the MDT, and thus may be in the form of an executive agreement solely within the powers of the President and not requiring Senate concurrence,鈥� he said.
鈥淭he executive agreement must not go beyond the parameters, limitations, and standards set by the law and/or treaty that the former purports to implement and must not unduly expand the international obligation expressly mentioned or necessarily implied in the law or treaty,鈥� it said.
The court ruled that the President must be accorded wider discretion in making decisions regarding external affairs, limited only by the letter of the law.
PROTEST AGAINST EDCA Militant groups picket in front of the Supreme Court building in Manila just before the high court鈥檚 announcement that the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (Edca) is constitutional. MARIANNE BERMUDEZ
鈥淣o court can tell the President to desist from choosing an executive agreement over a treaty to embody an international agreement, unless the case falls squarely within Article XVIII, Section 25,鈥� Te said in summarizing the court鈥檚 ruling.
鈥淚n view of the vast constitutional powers and prerogatives granted to the President in the field of foreign affairs, the task of the court is to determine whether the international agreement is consistent with the applicable limitations,鈥� he said.
New platform
The Edca provides for increased rotational presence of US troops in the Philippines, allowing more opportunities for the long-standing defense allies to undertake joint military exercises in the areas of mutual defense and disaster response.
Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin and US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg signed the pact just before US President Barack Obama arrived in Manila for a state visit in April 2014.
The Supreme Court ruling came amid America鈥檚 continuing strategic pivot to the Asia-Pacific, and the Philippines鈥� attempts to strengthen its defense amid the disputes in the South China Sea.
Solicitor General Florin Hilbay, who defended the Edca on the government鈥檚 behalf, hailed the court decision, saying it 鈥減aves the way for an enhanced security arrangement that will respond to the current domestic and regional concerns.鈥�
鈥淚t also breathes a practical spirit into one of the oldest defense alliances, creating a new platform for cooperation between the Philippines and the United States. It reaffirms the potency of the powers of the President as Chief Executive, Commander in Chief and chief architect of foreign affairs,鈥� Hilbay said in a statement.